⌘
Manual Review
Line-by-line review of business logic, architecture, permissions and trust assumptions.
HOW WE WORK
Methodology
Multiple layers of analysis designed to identify both common vulnerabilities and protocol-specific logic risks.
▣
Automated Analysis
Supporting static-analysis tools with manual triage of scanner output.
⚔
Adversarial Testing
Targeted tests and exploit-oriented proof-of-concept validation.
⌁
Fuzz & Property Testing
Generated inputs and property checks against critical behavior and accounting.
↗
On-chain Verification
Runtime bytecode, deployed configuration and integration state where relevant.
▤
Report & Remediation
Actionable findings with severity, evidence and recommended fixes.
Evidence-driven security review
Our process is designed to combine manual reasoning with automated support and reproducible testing. Scanner warnings are not treated as vulnerabilities without technical validation.
Each engagement is scoped to the code and deployment evidence identified in the report. Where fixes are supplied, a focused remediation review can verify the updated implementation.
Typical review areas
- Access control and privileged roles
- Asset flows and accounting
- External calls and reentrancy surfaces
- DEX and oracle interactions
- Fee and tokenomics implementation
- Upgradeability and initialization
- Edge cases, fuzzing and protocol invariants